Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Figure 3 | Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling

Figure 3

From: Hybrid dynamic/static method for large-scale simulation of metabolism

Figure 3

Comparisons of time courses produced by dynamic and hybrid models. The coloured lines and the broken black lines represent the time courses calculated by dynamic and hybrid models, respectively. Refer to Fig. 2 for pathway nomenclature. The hybrid model in Fig. 2a yielded similar time courses of change in the reaction rates and the metabolite concentrations to the corresponding dynamic model. (a) The reaction rates of E_BC (yellow) and E_DF (blue). (b) The concentrations of compounds D (yellow) and H (blue). The time courses of the pathway model in Fig. 2b were also in agreement with the dynamic model. (c) The reaction rates of E_BC (yellow), E_CF (green), E_CE (red), and E_CD (blue). (d) The concentrations of compounds E (yellow) and H (blue). The results of these models were also in good agreement for the erythrocyte model. (e) The reaction rates of the hybrid model differed only slightly from those of the dynamic model. The lines in blue, purple, yellow, green, and red denote the reaction rates of GSSGR, G6PDH, TK2, TA and R5PI, respectively. (f) The hybrid and dynamic models yielded almost identical time courses in the concentrations of metabolites such as X5P (yellow), GSSG (blue), and NADP (red).

Back to article page