Skip to main content

Table 4 The effect of the size of the perturbation

From: Priming nonlinear searches for pathway identification

 

Computed

5 %

10 %

50 %

200 %

a10

0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0001

0.0008

a11

-14.6780

-14.3647

-14.1817

-13.1496

-11.3439

a12

0

-0.1466

-0.1429

-0.0671

0.5735

a13

7.3390

7.3414

7.3438

7.3598

7.3735

a14

0

-0.2165

-0.3673

-1.2462

-2.7619

a15

-7.3390

-7.1723

-7.0780

-6.4846

-5.2501

a20

0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

-0.0003

a21

14.6780

14.6119

14.5748

14.4207

14.5029

a22

-14.6780

-14.6540

-14.6623

-14.7503

-15.1862

a23

0

-0.0009

-0.0016

-0.0054

-0.0070

a24

0

0.0494

0.0839

0.2494

0.3462

a25

0

-0.0309

-0.0464

-0.1119

-0.0951

a30

0

0.0000

0.0000

0.0004

0.0038

a31

0

-2.3527

-4.5412

-18.2307

-46.8953

a32

0

1.3989

2.6336

9.8422

24.4004

a33

-27.2517

-27.9204

-28.5955

-34.0204

-54.4047

a34

0

1.7491

3.4009

14.0961

39.3252

a35

0

-0.9955

-1.8949

-7.0627

-15.4759

a40

0

0.0000

0.0000

-0.0001

0.0001

a41

0

2.0843

3.7814

14.7316

41.5863

a42

0

-1.0925

-1.7693

-5.5766

-13.2688

a43

18.5664

19.0295

19.4964

23.2397

37.1866

a44

-18.5664

-20.2112

-21.6608

-31.4631

-58.1065

a45

-9.2832

-8.3594

-7.6404

-3.2226

6.5808

a50

0

0.0000

0.0000

-0.0001

-0.0015

a51

0

-0.4026

-0.6581

-2.5848

-10.1097

a52

0

0.1384

0.0830

-0.1317

0.1582

a53

0

-0.0059

-0.0110

-0.0435

-0.0879

a54

18.5664

18.8987

19.1602

21.0620

27.2722

a55

-18.5664

-18.7852

-18.9201

-20.0013

-24.0836

  1. Overall, the estimated coefficients deviate more strongly from the corresponding computed values as the perturbation increases. However, there are substantial differences between variables. The coefficients associated with variable X 2, for example, are hardly influenced, while the coefficients associated with X 3 are strongly affected. Overall, the method seems to produce the best results for perturbation up to 10%. The datasets for the regression consisted of 401 data points in the interval [0,4] and the method of linearization was option II.